Central
American Development
The Impact of Trade Liberalization
in the 1990s
InterAction, February, 2004
for more information, contact Vincent McElhinny
at vmcelhinny@interaction.org
Trade
Liberalization has already occurred in Central
America. Tariff levels have dropped and imports
have surged dramatically in the 1990s. In the
region’s poorest country, Nicaragua, the
average tariff has dropped from 43.2% to 5%
in less than a decade. But has development followed?
Export
Growth – Exports more than doubled
in the 1990s (from $5 to $15 billion), but imports
rose even faster. An increased reliance on remittances
and ‘replacement migration’ is now
required to finance the Central American trade
deficit.
Economic
Growth – Growth has been relatively
stagnant, compared to the 1970’s growth
rate of 6% (2.7% per capita). In the “lost
decade” of the 1980’s growth averaged
only 1%; in the 1990s growth rose to 4.1% (1.8
% per capita), but has been flat since 1997
and well below the East Asian average of 7%
for the last three decades (IDB 2002)
Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI) – On
average, Central American countries have seen
an increase in FDI of $375 million per year
(1998-2000). However this investment was driven
largely by privatization, biased toward construction
rather than productive fixed investment and
domestic savings – which remain far below
levels necessary for sustainable development.
Few forward and backward linkages were created.
Export oriented investment (ie. Maquilas) use
of local inputs remains minimal.
Productivity
– Total factor productivity rates
have actually fallen in Central America over
the past decade, especially in the agricultural
sector (IDB Research Dept, 2002). Total Factor
Productivity Growth 1991-2000 has been disappointing,
for Costa Rica ( +0.2%), Guatemala ( - 0.5%),
El Salvador (- 0.85%), Nicaragua ( -1.6%) and
Honduras (- 1.95%)
Competitiveness
– Central American countries
rank close to last on the World Economic Forum’s
Growth Competitiveness Index (El Salvador ranks
48 & Costa Rica ranks 51, and Guatemala,
Nicaragua and Honduras rank 89,90 and 94 out
of 102 countries.)
In
sum, increased dynamism and diversification
in Central American exports in the 1990s have
not jumpstarted the Central American economies.
Growth, in turn, has not increased fast enough
to significantly reduce poverty and inequality,
create jobs, or stem environmental degradation.
Liberalization has instead been associated with
rising levels of criminal violence, social and
political instability and the hollowing out
of democracy.
Poverty
– Trade liberalization has failed
to lower poverty - the principal Millennium
Development Goal. Relative poverty in the region
is 55%, and 2 or every 3 Central Americans in
rural areas are poor.
Inequality
– Trade liberalization has increased income
inequality in the region, even in Costa Rica.
Central America has sustained one of the highest
levels of income inequality in the world, with
a Gini coefficient of 0.55. A recent agrarian
census in Guatemala shows that the distribution
of land is essentially unchanged since 1979.
Trade has also failed to diminish the gap between
Central America and the North, or between rural
and urban areas. Central America, in terms of
GDP per capita, lost ground relative to the
U.S. over the past 25 years.
GDP per capita
(CA/US as %) 1975
1999
Costa Rica
29 27
El Salvador
23 13.5
Guatemala 17
12
Nicaragua
25
7
Honduras
22 18
Jobs
– 600,000 Central American jobs have been
permanently lost to the coffee crisis out of
a rural labor force of 6 million. The maquila
sector has leveled off at 400,000 jobs out of
a total labor force of 13 million. The only
increase in employment has been in the informal
sector, which now represents 60% of the region’s
workforce.
Hunger
– In Central America, indices
of malnutrition, measured by average weight
and height, have increased in Nicaragua, Honduras
and Costa Rica. The World Food Program 2002
Report states that 8.6 million Central Americans
(1 in 4) continue to suffer from hunger or food
insecurity.
The
downsizing of the Central American state –
In the view of the IDB (2002), the shrinking
state has crippled its capacity to carry out
its basic functions, such as enforcing the rule
of law, collecting taxes and promoting the health
and education of people entering the work force.
Weak
State Fiscal Authority – Central
American capacity to collect taxes remains far
below expected levels relative to similarly
developed countries. The IDB shows that Central
Americans should be collecting about 15% of
their GDP in taxes, while the actual level is
about 10% of GDP. Despite a decade of reforms,
the 1990s have seen public investment levels
remain well below (-25 to –60%) expected
levels.
Corruption
- The most recent Corruptions Perception
Index (CPI) released by Transparency International
show that the corruption remains very high,
and in the cases of Costa Rica, Guatemala and
Honduras – is worsening. Of 133 countries
ranked, Costa Ricas occupies position 46, El
Salvador 59, Panama 66, Nicaragua 88, Guatemala
100 and Honduras 106. (www.transparency.org)
Debt
– Massive bailouts of a failing
financial sector and rising internal and external
debt have wiped out the HIPC debt forgiveness
gains of Nicaragua and Honduras. After a decade
of capital accounts liberalization, Central
America has accumulated nearly $10 billion in
unsustainable, additional debt.
Education
not growing fast enough – Central
America continues to under invest in education,
spending about 2.4% of its GDP on education,
while the IDB estimates that the region should
be spending at least 4%. As a result, the education
gap between Central America and the world is
growing. Most of Central America is not on track
to meet the MDG in Education, and even in Costa
Rica students are dropping out of secondary
school in record numbers.
Rule
of Law/Crime/Violence – Social
Violence has reached epidemic proportions, now
approximating the worst political violence of
the civil war years in several countries.
%
Pop. Victimized Homicide Rate
by Property Crime per 100,000 pop.
(1996-2000)
Guatemala
54.9
35
El Salvador
47.1
93
Honduras
36.3
40
Nicaragua
35.7
10.5
Costa Rica
32.7
9.7
Mexico
47.9
19.6
Colombia
37.4
76
LatAm/Carribean 30.0
30
US
10.0
10
Hollowing
out of Democracy: The fragile process
of democratization is threatened by the non-democratic
formulation of development policies (like trade)
and the lack of any perceived economic payoff
after nearly a decade of reforms. Latinobarometer
surveys of Central America report an alarming
deterioration in support for recent political
and economic reforms that trend in the wrong
direction.
- 58%
are unsatisfied with the performance of
their respective market economies
-
68% say that privatization has been a bad
idea.
- 80%
believe that corruption has increased.
- 50%
say that democracy does not function in
the region.
- 85%
of Central Americans have little or no confidence
in their political parties
Migration
& Remittances: Recent studies have
shown that increased labor mobility would generate
greater financial benefits for poor countries
than free trade. Four of the five countries
increasingly rely on migration and remittances
as a de facto social policy and to cover an
expanding trade deficit with the U.S. The primary
export for Central America has become labor.
Some 200,000 – 300,000 Central Americas
attempt to migrate to the U.S. through legal
and illegal means every year. Macroeconomic
stability is now and will continue to be dependent
upon the $5.5 billion sent home annually from
the U.S., more than foreign direct investment,
official development assistance and external
lending combined.
Sources:
IDB & World Bank Country Strategies, Program
Evaluations; Agosin, Manuel, Roberto Machado
and Paulino Nazal (November 2002)
“The Economies of Central America and
the Dominican Republic: Evolution and Long Term
Challenges,” IDB Sector Study RE2-02-001;
World Bank Development Indicators (2003); Latinobarometer
(2002); Salazar-Xirinachs José M. and
Jaime Granados (May 2003) “The United
States-Central America Free Trade Agreement:
Opportunities and Challenges”; Juan Luis
Londono, Alejandro Gaviria, and Rodrigo Guerrero
(2000) Asalto al Desarollo: Violencia en America
Latina. IDB; Latinobarometer, 2002
©
|